Who Is Qualified To Write An EB-2 NIW Expert Opinion Letter?

Quick Answer: An EB-2 NIW expert opinion letter should be written by a credentialed professional with meaningful expertise in — or closely related to — the petitioner’s field. Qualified authors typically include university professors, senior scientists, industry executives, technical leaders, or recognized subject-matter experts. The most important factors are relevance, professional credibility, the ability to independently evaluate the petitioner’s work, and the capacity to connect that work to the national interest standard under the Dhanasar framework.

Table of Contents

Introduction

When preparing an EB-2 National Interest Waiver petition, one of the most consequential decisions you’ll make is choosing who writes your expert opinion letters. These letters aren’t formalities. They’re substantive professional assessments that USCIS adjudicators read alongside your evidence to evaluate whether your work has substantial merit, national importance, and whether you are well-positioned to advance your proposed endeavor.

The wrong choice — someone with no meaningful connection to your field, or someone who produces a generic template letter without reviewing your actual evidence — can undermine an otherwise strong petition. The right choice, on the other hand, provides a credible professional lens through which USCIS can better understand the significance and scope of your contributions.

This guide explains exactly who is qualified to write an EB-2 NIW expert opinion letter, what credentials and qualities to look for, how to evaluate a potential expert’s independence, and what the letter itself should accomplish. If you’re building or strengthening a National Interest Waiver petition, understanding these factors will help you make informed decisions — and help you work more effectively with your immigration counsel.

Disclaimer: AAE Evaluations provides professional document preparation and evaluation services. We are not a law firm and do not provide legal advice or immigration representation. Consult a qualified immigration attorney for legal guidance specific to your case.

What Is an EB-2 NIW Expert Opinion Letter?

An EB-2 NIW expert opinion letter is a formal professional assessment written by a subject-matter expert to support a National Interest Waiver petition. Its purpose is to provide an independent, field-specific analysis of the petitioner’s work, qualifications, and proposed endeavor — context that a résumé or list of publications alone cannot fully convey.

This is not the same as a personal recommendation letter. A recommendation letter typically speaks to character, professional relationships, or general competence. An expert opinion letter, by contrast, is analytical. It explains why the petitioner’s work matters in the broader context of their field, what impact their proposed endeavor is expected to have, and why the petitioner is particularly qualified to carry it out.

To understand the distinction clearly, see our detailed breakdown of expert opinion letters vs. EB-2 NIW recommendation letters.

The letter functions as part of a broader evidence package and is evaluated in light of the three-prong standard established in Matter of Dhanasar (2016). It doesn’t replace legal argument or other evidence — it adds a professional dimension that can help USCIS better understand complex, technical, or specialized work.

Who Is Qualified to Write an EB-2 NIW Expert Opinion Letter?

A qualified author for an EB-2 NIW expert opinion letter is a credentialed professional who has the subject-matter expertise to meaningfully evaluate the petitioner’s work and proposed endeavor. There is no single credential type that USCIS mandates — what matters is whether the expert can speak with genuine authority about the field and provide analysis that goes beyond what the petitioner’s own documents already show.

The following categories represent common types of qualified experts, though the best fit depends on the specific field and proposed endeavor.

University Professors and Academic Researchers

Academics are frequently chosen as expert authors because their credentials are transparent and easy for USCIS adjudicators to evaluate. A tenured professor at a recognized research university, a department chair, or a principal investigator with a strong publication record in the petitioner’s field can provide authoritative analysis of the scientific, technical, or scholarly merit of the work.

What makes academic experts particularly useful is that their professional lives center on evaluating research — through peer review, graduate student mentorship, and grant assessment. That context translates well into an expert opinion letter.

That said, a professor’s value depends on relevance. A biomedical researcher writing about AI applications in drug discovery carries weight; a literature professor writing about the same topic does not.

Senior Scientists and Research Professionals

For petitions involving STEM fields — including engineering, physics, chemistry, environmental science, or clinical research — senior scientists at national laboratories, R&D divisions, or research institutions can serve as strong expert authors. Their practical, applied knowledge of the field complements academic perspectives and can speak to real-world impact in ways that purely theoretical commentary cannot.

If the petitioner’s proposed endeavor involves commercializing technology, developing new methods, or advancing applied science, a senior researcher with industry or institutional experience in that specific area may be especially relevant.

Industry Executives and Technical Leaders

Not all petitioners work in academia, and their experts don’t need to either. For professionals in technology, engineering, healthcare, biotechnology, finance, or other industries, senior executives and technical leaders — including CTOs, senior engineers, R&D directors, and principal architects — can be highly effective expert authors, provided they have direct expertise in the relevant domain.

An executive who has spent two decades building AI systems can speak with genuine authority about a petitioner developing novel machine learning models. A healthcare system CEO with a clinical background can assess the national importance of a physician-researcher’s proposed clinical program. The key is that their credentials must be demonstrably relevant — not just impressive in a general sense.

Government and Public Policy Professionals

Some National Interest Waiver petitions center on work in public policy, economics, public health, national security, or infrastructure. In these cases, professionals with substantive government, regulatory, or policy experience may be better positioned to assess the national importance of the proposed endeavor than a traditional academic expert.

A former federal agency official, a senior policy analyst at a research institution, or a recognized expert in regulatory affairs can offer meaningful perspective on why certain work matters at a national level — particularly when the petitioner’s proposed endeavor addresses government priorities, regulatory reform, or public health challenges.

Recognized Subject-Matter Experts

The category that often surprises petitioners is this one: you don’t need a professor or a C-suite title to be a qualified expert author. Someone who is widely recognized within a professional field — through publications, patents, keynote presentations, industry awards, professional board memberships, or other documented achievements — may be just as credible.

What matters is whether their accomplishments in the field give them the standing to evaluate the petitioner’s work. An inventor with 40 patents in semiconductor design can credibly assess a chip engineer’s proposed endeavor. A nationally recognized clinician with extensive peer-reviewed publications can speak with authority about the clinical significance of a medical researcher’s work.

If you’re working with AAE Evaluations’ expert opinion letter services, part of what we do is assess whether a potential expert has the credentials and field alignment to write a credible, petition-ready letter.

What Qualifications Should an EB-2 NIW Expert Have?

When evaluating a potential expert for your NIW petition, consider these factors:

Academic credentials — Advanced degrees in the relevant field (PhD, MD, JD, or equivalent professional degree)
Professional experience — Years of substantive work in the field, not just adjacent roles
Field-specific knowledge — Direct familiarity with the petitioner’s technical area, methodology, or subject matter
Publications and research — Peer-reviewed articles, books, white papers, or recognized technical reports
Patents or technical contributions — Particularly relevant for engineering, technology, and applied science petitions
Professional recognition — Awards, editorial board positions, conference presentations, professional society leadership
Ability to assess the petitioner’s work — The expert must be able to read and evaluate your CV, publications, research, and proposed endeavor with genuine comprehension
Capacity for independent professional judgment — The ability to form and articulate a professional opinion that goes beyond simply endorsing the petitioner

These qualifications should always be evaluated relative to the petitioner’s field. A distinguished professor in mechanical engineering doesn’t automatically make a strong expert for a petition involving public health economics. Fit matters as much as prestige.

Does the Expert Need to Be in the Same Field?

Not necessarily the exact same field — but close alignment is important. The further removed the expert is from the petitioner’s area of work, the less useful their analysis tends to be, and the less credibility it carries with USCIS adjudicators.

Here’s a practical way to think about it:

Petitioner’s Field	Strong Expert Match	Why the Match Matters
AI/Machine Learning	Computer science professor, senior ML engineer, AI research director	Can credibly evaluate algorithmic contributions and research impact
Biomedical Engineering	Bioengineer, translational researcher, or MD-PhD with relevant specialty	Understands the technical and clinical significance of the work
Environmental Science	Environmental scientist, climate researcher, or public policy expert in environmental regulation	Can assess both scientific merit and national environmental importance
Healthcare / Medicine	Physician-researcher, clinical department chair, or public health official	Speaks to clinical relevance, research quality, and patient impact
Public Policy / Economics	Economist, policy researcher, or former agency official in the relevant area	Can evaluate national importance from a governance or economic perspective
Cybersecurity / Software	Senior security engineer, software architect, or CTO with relevant technical background	Understands the technical contributions and their significance
Education / Social Science	Education researcher, program evaluator, or social science professor	Can assess evidence base, methodology, and social impact

Interdisciplinary petitions are common, and it’s appropriate in some cases to have experts from adjacent fields — particularly when the proposed endeavor crosses disciplinary lines. In those cases, the expert should be explicit about which aspects of the work they are qualified to assess.

Should an EB-2 NIW Expert Be Independent?

Independence is a meaningful factor, but it’s not a simple binary. USCIS generally looks more favorably on letters from experts who don’t have a direct employment or financial relationship with the petitioner, because it suggests their positive assessment isn’t motivated by personal interest. However, there’s no rule that automatically disqualifies someone with a prior connection.

Here’s how different relationship types tend to be viewed:

Fully independent experts (no prior relationship): Strongest position for independence. Their positive assessment carries the implication of an objective, outside evaluation.
Former professors or academic advisors: Generally acceptable. The academic relationship has usually concluded, and the professor’s expertise in the field is directly relevant.
Former supervisors or employers: More nuanced. If the letter focuses on first-hand professional knowledge of the petitioner’s work, that can have value — but it may be viewed differently than a letter from a disinterested expert.
Current employers or direct supervisors: These letters function more like employment verification than independent expert analysis. They can still be included in a petition, but shouldn’t substitute for independent expert opinion letters.
Professional collaborators: Case-specific. A co-author on a few papers is different from someone who spent years working alongside the petitioner on major projects. Transparency about the relationship matters.

The safest approach is to include at least some letters from experts who have no direct professional or financial ties to the petitioner. If some letters come from individuals with a prior relationship, being transparent about that relationship within the letter itself — and explaining why the expert is nonetheless qualified to comment — can help address any credibility questions.

For a full comparison of letter types and their roles, see our resource on recommendation letters for EB-2 NIW visa petitions.

Can a Professor Write an EB-2 NIW Expert Opinion Letter?

Yes — and professors are frequently among the most credible expert authors for NIW petitions, particularly in academic, scientific, and research-intensive fields. A professor who holds a relevant advanced degree, publishes in the petitioner’s field, and can speak with authority to the significance of the petitioner’s proposed endeavor is often an ideal choice.

What strengthens a professor’s letter is clear demonstration of subject-matter relevance. A professor with 30 years of experience in the petitioner’s exact subfield, who can situate the work within the broader landscape of research and explain its national importance, carries considerable weight.

A professor in an unrelated discipline, by contrast, adds limited analytical value regardless of their institutional prestige.

Can an Employer or Supervisor Write an EB-2 NIW Expert Opinion Letter?

An employer or current supervisor can provide a letter, but it typically serves a different function than an independent expert opinion letter. Because of the inherent relationship, an employer’s letter may be viewed primarily as confirming the petitioner’s role, responsibilities, and value to the organization — not as an independent professional assessment of the petitioner’s broader contributions to the field.

This doesn’t make such letters useless. They can document the petitioner’s work history, describe the significance of their role, and confirm that the organization benefits from the proposed endeavor. But they generally shouldn’t be the primary expert opinion letters in the petition.

For authoritative, field-level analysis of the petitioner’s work and its national importance, letters from experts with no direct employment relationship are typically more persuasive.

Can an Immigration Attorney Write the EB-2 NIW Expert Opinion Letter?

No — and this distinction is important. An immigration attorney’s role is to analyze the legal framework, develop petition strategy, prepare the legal brief, and ensure the petition is properly assembled and filed. That is a specialized and essential function.

But an immigration attorney is generally not a subject-matter expert in the petitioner’s technical or professional field. They are not positioned to provide a credible professional analysis of why a software engineer’s proposed AI research has substantial merit, or why a biomedical researcher’s clinical work advances the national interest.

These two roles — legal counsel and subject-matter expert — are distinct and complementary. Both can be important to a well-prepared petition. They are not interchangeable.

If you’re working with immigration counsel and need expert opinion letters to support your petition, AAE Evaluations works with attorneys and petitioners to produce field-matched, evidence-reviewed letters designed to complement the legal strategy your attorney has developed.

What Makes an EB-2 NIW Expert Opinion Letter Credible?

A credible expert opinion letter has several consistent characteristics:

Qualified, named author — Full name, credentials, institutional affiliation, and relevant experience clearly presented
Demonstrated expertise in the relevant field — Not just a general professional background, but specific knowledge relevant to the petitioner’s work
Independent professional judgment — Analysis that goes beyond repeating what the petitioner’s CV already says
Specific references to the petitioner’s work — Publications, patents, research projects, or technical contributions cited and evaluated
Evidence-based conclusions — Opinions grounded in the petitioner’s documented achievements, not unsupported superlatives
Clear connection to the Dhanasar framework — Addressing substantial merit, national importance, and the petitioner’s qualifications to advance the proposed endeavor
No template language — Each letter should reflect a genuine review of that specific petitioner’s case
Professional tone and structure — Written as a professional letter, not a personal reference or marketing document

What undermines credibility: vague praise (“Dr. X is one of the best in the field”), no citation of specific work, credentials that don’t match the field, or language that clearly wasn’t written by the named expert.

How Should an Expert Opinion Letter Address the Dhanasar Framework?

Matter of Dhanasar (USCIS 2016) established the three-prong framework that governs EB-2 NIW adjudication. A well-prepared expert opinion letter typically addresses all three prongs with field-specific analysis.

Prong 1: Substantial Merit and National Importance

The expert should explain why the petitioner’s proposed endeavor matters — both within the field and in a broader national context. This involves more than saying the work is “important.” A strong letter explains what problem is being addressed, why it’s significant relative to current research or practice, and how the field views the area of work.

This is where subject-matter expertise is most critical. A credible expert can situate the petitioner’s work within existing literature, policy discussions, or industry trends in a way that a non-expert cannot.

Prong 2: Well Positioned to Advance the Proposed Endeavor

Here the expert evaluates the petitioner’s qualifications — their education, professional experience, publications, citations, technical skills, research record, patents, and other achievements — and explains why these qualifications make the petitioner particularly capable of carrying out the proposed endeavor.

This section benefits most from a thorough review of the petitioner’s CV and supporting documentation. An expert who has genuinely reviewed the evidence can speak specifically and credibly. One who hasn’t will produce generic analysis that USCIS may discount.

For petitions that include work experience evaluations, that documentation can provide additional context for the expert’s assessment of the petitioner’s qualifications.

Prong 3: On Balance, It Would Be Beneficial to Waive the Job Offer and Labor Certification Requirements

The expert can contribute to this prong by explaining why the petitioner’s work is best pursued with the flexibility of a waiver — for example, if the proposed endeavor requires independent research, involves collaborating across institutions, or addresses a field where limiting the petitioner to a single employer would restrict their ability to achieve the intended national benefit.

This prong involves both factual context (which the expert can provide) and legal analysis (which is the attorney’s domain). The letter should not attempt to substitute for legal argument — it should support it.

What Should an Expert Review Before Writing the Letter?

A genuine, credible expert opinion letter comes from a genuine review of the petitioner’s materials. Before writing, an expert should have access to:

Curriculum vitae / résumé — Full professional and academic history
Proposed endeavor statement — A clear description of what the petitioner intends to do in the United States
Publications — Peer-reviewed articles, book chapters, technical reports
Citation data — Evidence of how the work has been used or referenced by others
Patents — If applicable, descriptions of filed or granted patents
Awards and honors — Documentation of professional recognition
Research or project summaries — Plain-language descriptions of complex work
Employment history — Particularly for cases involving applied or industry-based work
Business plan — If the proposed endeavor involves entrepreneurial or commercial activity
RFE notice — If the letter is being prepared in response to a Request for Evidence, the expert needs to understand what USCIS has raised
Attorney-provided guidance — Where applicable, a summary of the petition strategy to ensure the letter supports rather than conflicts with the legal brief

At AAE Evaluations, our process includes a structured evidence review before any expert begins drafting a letter. Letters written without reviewing the actual evidence tend to be generic — and USCIS adjudicators notice the difference.

What Should You Avoid When Choosing an EB-2 NIW Expert?

A few warning signs that a potential expert may not be the right choice:

No meaningful connection to the field — General professional experience that doesn’t connect to the petitioner’s specific area of work
Unable to explain the petitioner’s contributions — If the expert can’t describe what makes the work significant, the letter will likely reflect that gap
Template-based letters — Boilerplate language adapted from a prior letter, with the petitioner’s name swapped in, adds little analytical value
No evidence review — A letter written without reviewing the petitioner’s actual publications, research, or proposed endeavor will be vague and unconvincing
Unsupported superlatives — Claims like “one of the most brilliant researchers I’ve encountered” without supporting analysis undercut rather than strengthen the letter
Credentials that don’t hold up — Impressive-sounding titles that turn out to be from unaccredited institutions or unverifiable professional associations
Signing without reading — Some letters are written entirely by a third party and then signed by someone who hasn’t actually reviewed the case; this is both ethically problematic and potentially a liability in the petition

The goal is credibility. An expert who genuinely reviewed your case, has the credentials to evaluate it, and can articulate meaningful analysis is far more valuable than a famous name attached to a generic letter.

Expert Opinion Letter vs. Recommendation Letter

These two document types serve different functions in an EB-2 NIW petition. Understanding the distinction helps petitioners build a more strategic evidence package.

Feature	Expert Opinion Letter	EB-2 NIW Recommendation Letter
Primary purpose	Independent professional analysis of the petitioner’s work and proposed endeavor	Professional endorsement based on direct knowledge
Focus	Field significance, national importance, Dhanasar framework	Petitioner’s qualifications, professional character, achievements
Expert analysis	Central — the letter’s core purpose	Secondary — supportive rather than analytical
Relationship to petitioner	Often independent; no required prior connection	Often direct — former advisor, collaborator, colleague
Evidence discussed	Publications, research, patents, proposed endeavor — reviewed independently	Personal professional knowledge of the petitioner
Typical role in petition	Demonstrates external professional validation of the work’s significance	Corroborates petitioner’s track record and professional standing

For petitions that benefit from both types, AAE Evaluations offers EB-2 NIW recommendation letter services alongside expert opinion letter preparation, allowing petitioners to build a comprehensive letter package tailored to their specific case.

How Many EB-2 NIW Expert Opinion Letters Do You Need?

There’s no universal answer — and you should be cautious about anyone who tells you a specific number guarantees a stronger petition.

What matters more than quantity is quality, relevance, and credibility. Three letters from genuinely qualified, independent experts who have reviewed the petitioner’s actual evidence will generally outperform five letters from loosely connected professionals offering generic praise.

Practically speaking, most NIW petitions include multiple expert letters — often a mix of expert opinion letters and recommendation letters — but the right number depends on the specific petition strategy, the petitioner’s field, the strength of available experts, and any specific issues identified by immigration counsel.

If you’re responding to an NIW RFE, the number and content of expert letters may be directly tied to what USCIS has questioned. In those situations, petition-specific strategy is essential.

Discuss the appropriate letter strategy with your immigration attorney. The AAE Evaluations services page provides an overview of the types of letters and evaluations available to support different petition scenarios.

How AAE Evaluations Helps With EB-2 NIW Expert Opinion Letters

AAE Evaluations is a professional document preparation and evaluation service that specializes in supporting EB-2 NIW petitions. We work with petitioners and immigration attorneys to produce expert opinion letters that are field-matched, evidence-reviewed, and structured around the Dhanasar framework.

Our process typically includes:

Field-matched expert selection — Identifying experts with genuine subject-matter relevance to the petitioner’s specific field and proposed endeavor
Evidence review — Providing the expert with the petitioner’s CV, publications, proposed endeavor statement, and other supporting documentation before drafting begins
Customized letter preparation — Each letter is written specifically for the petitioner’s case, not adapted from a template
Dhanasar-focused analysis — Letters are structured to address substantial merit, national importance, and the petitioner’s qualifications in a way that supports the legal argument
Expert review and signature — The named expert reviews, revises where appropriate, and signs the final letter
RFE support — Where a petition has received a Request for Evidence, letters can be prepared specifically to address USCIS’s stated concerns
Attorney coordination — We work alongside immigration counsel to ensure letters align with the overall petition strategy

We do not provide legal advice, prepare immigration petitions, or represent petitioners before USCIS. For legal strategy, filing, and representation, work with a qualified immigration attorney.

If you need support with O-1 visa petitions, AAE Evaluations also offers O-1 expert and advisory letters and related evaluation services.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Who can write an EB-2 NIW expert opinion letter?

A qualified professional with substantive expertise in — or closely related to — the petitioner’s field. This typically includes university professors, senior scientists, industry executives, technical leaders, government or policy professionals, and other recognized subject-matter experts. The most important factors are relevant credentials, field knowledge, and the ability to provide genuine, evidence-based analysis of the petitioner’s work and proposed endeavor.

2. Does an EB-2 NIW expert need to be a professor?

No. While professors are common expert authors and their credentials are easy for adjudicators to evaluate, they are not required. Senior industry professionals, research scientists, technical executives, and other recognized experts can write equally credible letters, provided they have clear expertise in the relevant field.

3. Should an NIW expert be independent?

Independence strengthens credibility. Experts with no prior professional or financial relationship with the petitioner are generally viewed as more objective. However, letters from former professors, collaborators, or professionals with prior connections aren’t automatically disqualifying — transparency about the relationship and strong substantive analysis can preserve the letter’s credibility.

4. Can my former professor write an expert opinion letter?

Yes, and former professors are often strong choices. Because the academic relationship has typically ended by the time of the petition, a former professor with direct expertise in the petitioner’s field can provide both relevant knowledge and a degree of professional independence.

5. Can my employer write an EB-2 NIW expert opinion letter?

An employer can write a letter, but it typically functions differently than an independent expert opinion letter — more as professional verification of the petitioner’s role and value than as independent field analysis. A petition generally benefits from having at least some letters from experts with no direct employment relationship.

6. Can an immigration attorney write the expert letter?

No. An immigration attorney provides legal representation and strategic analysis — they are not typically a subject-matter expert in the petitioner’s professional or technical field. The expert opinion letter and the legal brief serve distinct functions. Both are important; neither replaces the other.

7. Does the expert need to work in exactly the same field?

Not necessarily the exact same subfield, but close alignment matters. An expert in a closely related or adjacent discipline can be appropriate — particularly for interdisciplinary work — as long as they genuinely understand the petitioner’s proposed endeavor and can evaluate it meaningfully.

8. What credentials should an NIW expert have?

Relevant credentials include advanced degrees in the relevant field, published research, professional recognition (awards, editorial positions, conference presentations), patents or technical contributions, and substantial professional experience in the subject area. Credentials should always be evaluated in the context of the petitioner’s specific field.

9. What should an EB-2 NIW expert opinion letter include?

A strong letter includes: the expert’s credentials and basis for authority; specific analysis of the petitioner’s work, publications, and research; explanation of the proposed endeavor’s merit and national importance; assessment of the petitioner’s qualifications to advance that endeavor; and evidence-based conclusions structured around the Dhanasar framework. Generic praise without specific analysis is not sufficient.

10. Can an expert opinion letter help respond to an NIW RFE?

Yes — an expert opinion letter can be a valuable component of an NIW RFE response, particularly if USCIS has questioned the national importance of the proposed endeavor, the petitioner’s qualifications, or the strength of prior expert analysis. Letters prepared for RFE responses should be specifically tailored to address USCIS’s stated concerns.

11. How many expert opinion letters are needed for an EB-2 NIW petition?

There is no universally correct number. Quality and credibility outweigh quantity. Most petitions include multiple letters — a combination of expert opinion letters and recommendation letters — but the right mix depends on the petition strategy developed with immigration counsel.

12. How can I find a qualified EB-2 NIW expert?

Start by identifying professionals in your field who have the credentials and independence to provide a credible assessment. If you’re unsure where to begin, AAE Evaluations can assist with expert selection, evidence review, and letter preparation — working alongside your immigration attorney to ensure the letters support your overall petition strategy.

Conclusion

Choosing who writes your EB-2 NIW expert opinion letter is one of the most strategically important decisions in your National Interest Waiver petition. The right expert — credentialed, field-relevant, independent, and genuinely engaged with your evidence — can provide the kind of authoritative, substantive analysis that helps USCIS understand why your work matters and why you are the right person to advance it.

There’s no single profile that defines the ideal expert author. Professors, senior scientists, industry executives, policy professionals, and recognized subject-matter experts can all serve effectively, depending on your field and proposed endeavor. What they must share is genuine expertise, relevant credentials, and the ability to analyze your work honestly and in depth.

Avoid shortcuts: a generic letter from an impressive-sounding name adds little value. A carefully selected, evidence-reviewed letter from a credible expert in your specific area can meaningfully strengthen your petition.

If you’re building an EB-2 NIW petition and need professionally prepared, field-matched expert opinion letters, explore what AAE Evaluations offers and work with your immigration attorney to develop a comprehensive strategy that gives your case its best presentation.

AAE Evaluations provides professional document preparation and evaluation services for immigration petitions. We do not provide legal advice, immigration representation, or guarantee any immigration outcome. Consult a qualified immigration attorney for legal guidance specific to your situation.